Former University of Wisconsin–La Crosse Chancellor Joe Gow said Thursday that the school’s governing board fired him because members were uncomfortable with him and his wife producing and appearing in pornographic videos, according to a report from the Associated Press.
The Universities of Wisconsin Board of Regents, which oversees UW–Madison, UW–La Crosse, and 11 other regional campuses, voted unanimously during a hastily convened closed meeting Wednesday evening to fire Gow.
After the vote, Universities of Wisconsin President Jay Rothman and regents President Karen Walsh issued statements saying the regents had learned of specific conduct by Gow that subjected the university to “significant reputational harm.” Rothman called Gow’s actions “abhorrent” and Walsh said she was “disgusted.” But neither of them offered any details of the allegations.
Gow told The Associated Press in a phone interview Thursday morning that regents had discovered that he and his wife, former UW–La Crosse professor Carmen Wilson, had been producing and appearing in pornographic videos.
He maintained that he never mentioned UW–La Crosse or his role at the university in any of the videos and the firing violated his free speech rights.
Gow also complained that the regents never told him what policy he violated and he was never given a hearing or other opportunity to present his case. He said he’s contemplating a lawsuit.
Rothman said in an email to the AP on Thursday morning that Gow failed to act as a role model for students, faculty and the community and mistakenly believes the First Amendment equates to a “free pass to say or do anything that he pleases.”
Rothman added that Gow served at the pleasure of the regents and was not entitled to any specific process.
Gow took heavy criticism in 2018 for inviting porn actor Nina Hartley to speak at UW–La Crosse. He paid her $5,000 out of student fees to appear. Ray Cross, then UW system president, reprimanded him and the regents refused to give him a raise that year. Gow said then that he was exercising the system’s free speech policies.
